Hobbs suit PDF'ed and online

Author	Comment
DaveNJEsq	Hobbs suit PDF'ed and online	Lead	[-]
Posts: 494 (12/08/2008 11:20 AM) WM3DB Member Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Tags : None I received a copy of the Hobbs suit from the Pualski County Clerk's office - PDF'ed and now online: Hobbs defamation suit http://www.dpdlaw.com/hob...ainesdefamation.pdf
kidsampson022		#1	[-]
Posts: 136 (12/08/2008 12:14 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Ta dave sheer edited: I saw someone on here (can't remember who) state that the letter is no longer on the Dixie Chicks Website. It is still there: http://www.dixiechicks.co...ressDetail.asp?newsID=669 Last Edited By: kidsampson022 12/08/2008 12:27 PM. Edited 1 times.
enuffizenuff		#2	[-]
Posts: 459 (12/08/2008 12:47 PM) Starving the Trolls Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Remember you don't stop laughing because you grow old, you grow old because you stop laughing. Last Edited By: enuffizenuff 12/08/2008 1:09 PM. Edited 1 times.
kidsampson022		#3	[-]
Posts: 139 (12/08/2008 1:12 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Thanks enuff. I think it'd a good idea to remove it. It's prudent. sheer
AnimeJSK		#4	[-]
Posts: 113 (12/08/2008 1:15 PM) WM3DB Member Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	"over the world-wide internet" As opposed to the Mid-South Internet????? "not based on fact, and, in fact, were false and reckless at the time of publication" Fun, fun!! We get to see them try to prove this.... I really hope they're not going to bank on the distinction between "match" and "consistent with" - it's like saying Farm and Newman are two different people. This is like a paternity test result - we can't say for 100% sure ever that a test indicates paternity, we can just say that it "doesn't exclude" or "is consistent with". But most of the general public accepts a certain level of consistency as a "match". I'm going to assume that the majority of the jurors are not going to be scientists or doctors...and neither is Natalie Maines Pasdar. This is a weak semantic approach at best. If you read carefully, you will also see that Ms. Maines-Pasdar expresses that she is just restating the points made in Echols' October filing, she is not asserting anything. Dunno if that makes a legal difference, but the whole thing is such nonsense anyway...
Bitlippy		#5	[-]
Posts: 552 (12/08/2008 4:06 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	there is absolutely nothing in the letter from Maines about hobbs ,the so called libellous remarks were further down the page beneath her signature not on top of it . even if she did write the remainder of the words on the webpage : the only questionable remark made was that 'he washed clothes for no other reason than to hide evidence ' and that is clearly stated as being from an affidavit and if the sisters of Pam say that in their statements and she repeats their allegations and she made it clear they were not facts but allegations tio be presented before the court. she has not claimed that as fact. she is repeating what she read or heard: all she said was that pam's sisters have said he washed clothes for no other reason than to hide evidence. hows that her fault? hobbs needs to go sue his ex sister in law if he doesnt like her comments, though good luck with that he even admits they all accused him publically and openly in fact screamed in the street that he murdered Stevie so why hasnt he sued them?
Miranda		#6	[-]
Posts: 65 (12/08/2008 4:11 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	I have a memory of at least one newbie here as a direct result of NM's involvement. I also think that there was a newbie non who was alerted to the case by NM. It would prove a fascinating exercise to compare ISP's of readers on the DC's site to new readers here to see how much traction that post garnered for this cause - a shame it would be such an herculean task! Surely only those supporters who are up to speed on the case would really be aware of who this Terry Hobbs guy is and how he fits in. It would also be of interest if there was a noticeable increase in donations from new people after the publicati0n of NM's letter and ditto after the rally from out of area people whose connection could possibly have been due to DC involvement. Similarly if the Topica list had a sudden influx too - maybe someone could poll the listees? Do very many people who are 'respected' members of the community with permenent and secure long term employment also live in their trucks as I believe TH to have done for a period? This was all prior to current credit crunch of course - maybe it is that that is now fueling this legal action? It would also be of interest to know how many 'Terry Hobbs' ot 'T Hobbs' are resident in the greater Memphis / West Memphis areas! Just curious. JMB's treatment was far harsher than anything suggested about TH and he never sought to seek financial recompense via the courts. Lawyer Dave ~ would he have had a better chance than TH appears to have now? Sheer - were that letter to be taken down now it would imply / infer far more egregious doings. As it stands there is no out right accusation and in the bullet points in summation of the Defence Filings the site has only paraphrased what would often appear to be, in part, 'accepted' as 'common knowledge' by a faction within the community of these boards. Were TH to truly be as effected by all of this as he claims then surely his best policy would have been to let the 'sleeping dog lie' rather than kicking up all this attention. Then again, maybe it is adding to the 'human interest' of his 'life rights'? And surely the fact that he sold the latter would mean, at minimum, that he is striving for a 'public persona'? Publicity at any Price? Miranda Wih apologies for the musings!
newman		#7	[-]
Posts: 564 (12/09/2008 6:44 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	JMB's treatment was far harsher than anything suggested about TH and he never sought to seek financial recompense via the courts. You have absolutely NO idea what you are talking about. Not only do I know for a fact that he did, I even assisted him.
Mara40		#8	[-]
Posts: 310 (12/09/2008 8:02 AM) WM3DB Member Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	even if she did write the remainder of the words on the webpage : the only questionable remark made was that 'he washed clothes for no other reason than to hide evidence ' and that is clearly stated as being from an affidavit and if the sisters of Pam say that in their statements and she repeats their allegations and she made it clear they were not facts but allegations tio be presented before the court. Maines didn't write the remainder of the words that are underneathe her letter - they are a Press Release put out by a Public Relations Firm on behalf of Echols Defence team in October. Maines said nothing about Hobbs in her letter but she does incude the press release on that page. "Taken out of context, I must seem very strange" - Ani DiFranco Last Edited By: Mara40 12/09/2008 8:07 AM. Edited 1 times.
newman		#9	[-]
Posts: 569 (12/09/2008 8:15 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	but she does incude the press release on that page. Yes, she "recklessley published or caused to be published malicious, libelous, slanderous and false statements concerning plantiff..."
johnsbabe269		#10	[-]
Posts: 107 (12/09/2008 8:21 AM) WM3DB Member Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Newman get over yourself and this confusing other world you and your friend live on! Geez Louiz!
newman		#11	[-]
Posts: 573 (12/09/2008 8:32 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	I'm sorry you're so confused.
kidsampson022		#12	[-]
Posts: 149 (12/09/2008 8:41 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Sheer - were that letter to be taken down now it would imply / infer far more egregious doings. As it stands there is no out right accusation and in the bullet points in summation of the Defence Filings the site has only paraphrased what would often appear to be, in part, 'accepted' as 'common knowledge' by a faction within the community of these boards Miranda, Enuff posted that it had been taken down. Her post has since been edited. My comment was in response to that. sheer
Mara40		#13	[-]
Posts: 312 (12/09/2008 8:43 AM) WM3DB Member Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Well, it will be interesting to see how this plays out. I'm not up with US law but it seems to be a weak case given its a press release that has already been released publicly by the PR firm of Echols Defense Team and not Maines herself. It's good to know the WM3 website is getting lots of hits as a result of this. "Taken out of context, I must seem very strange" - Ani DiFranco
newman		#14	[-]
Posts: 575 (12/09/2008 8:50 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	I'm not up with US law but it seems to be a weak case given its a press release that has already been released publicly by the PR firm of Echols Defense Team and not Maines herself. . I see,... so it wasn't published on her site. Interesting.
johnsbabe269		#15	[-]
Posts: 108 (12/09/2008 9:50 AM) WM3DB Member Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	I am not confused a bit Newman/Farm! I base my opinions, statements and such based on cold hard facts, truth, common sense....etc. Things you don't seem to get or understand in your world. I don't see how clearer and more factual it could get than what Mara40 has posted in her comments here and in the Natalie lawsuit thread! I've ragged enough about those not being Natalie's words, but have tried to refrane myself from it a bit so that I didn't come across as being ugly toward Lorri, the PR, Defense Team and those people. However, you can't refute documented print. Also by saying that I mean Yes, those repeated words were on the Dixie Chicks website, but they are repeated words that had already been released a month prior to appearing on the DC website! Why is that so hard for you to see? You obviously don't get the same news releases we do here on earth in your world Farm. So how did the posting on the DC website start a chain reaction of ruining Terry Hobb's character that hadn't already begun? The guys and company have a top leading defense team assembled, including attorneys from OJ Simpson's Dream Team that got him off a double murder charge. I don't think they'd screw up their client's case with/by printing, releasing public statements and filing in a court of law, things that are a bunch of lies and fabrication! Natalie Maines is smarter than that as well. She wouldn't have allowed anything posted on her site that didn't come from reliable factual sources. OMG and I don't wanna hear that crap about George Bush and the whole Shut Up and Sing incident. I'll tell you just like I tell my own husband, what Natalie said about him was Freedom of Speech and not far from the truth! Obviously most of the people who burned their records and talked smack about them realized it after awhile too because "Not Ready To Make Nice" won her an award!
johnnythechef		#16	[-]
Posts: 86 (12/09/2008 10:38 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	"those not being natalie's words" natalie seemed to think otherwise - in her words: "Below, I have written what the DNA and forensics evidence shows." click here edit to fix link: thanks wm3 Last Edited By: johnnythechef 12/09/2008 12:15 PM. Edited 1 times.
wm wronged the 3		#17	[-]
Posts: 654 (12/09/2008 10:57 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	It says page cant be found, Johnny. Remove yourself from the equation...we're here to see them free!
Miranda		#18	[-]
Posts: 72 (12/09/2008 1:23 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	newman wrote: You have absolutely NO idea what you are talking about. Not only do I know for a fact that he did, I even assisted him. Thanks Farm. I stand corrected. I should , of course, have inserted the phrase 'to my knowledge' in there to cma. Who was he considering suing and when? And why did it come to nothing? Or did it just end with a 'cease & desist' letter? Miranda Ps To Mods:- If this is verging too much 'off topic' then my apologies and no probs if it is relocated there.
ididjenna		#19	[-]
Posts: 28 (12/09/2008 3:34 PM) WM3DB Member Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Who was he considering suing and when? Exactly just Farm stirring his pot again. GO SUNS!!!!!
newman		#20	[-]
Posts: 582 (12/09/2008 6:21 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Who was he considering suing and when? Echols for wrongful death, and as late as last year, Miranda. Exactly just Farm stirring his pot again. I'm sorry, but I can't really accept responsibility for your ignorance.

Yuku free message boards

Hobbs suit PDF'ed and online

Quick Reply