Hobbs suit PDF'ed and online

Author	Comment
ididjenna		#21	[-]
Posts: 31 (12/09/2008 6:39 PM) WM3DB Member Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	The point Newman being he didnt sue anyone so you saying you assisted him when he didnt sue is pointless.hence you stirring the pot again GO SUNS!!!!!
Miranda		#22	[-]
Posts: 73 (12/09/2008 6:45 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	My thanks again, Farm. I would be inclined to think that if it really was as recently as last year it may well have been a feint to distract during the time he was learning far more about the evidence and views of the defence team but before he went 'public' on his change of stance. This is, however, merely my speculations on the matter. Miranda Edited to add ps to Jenna To be fair, he was responding to a comment I had made and it was, in fact, a perfectly valid part of the discussion. Last Edited By: Miranda 12/09/2008 6:47 PM. Edited 1 times.
newman		#23	[-]
Posts: 584 (12/09/2008 6:59 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	I would be inclined to think that if it really was as recently as last year it may well have been a feint to distract during the time he was learning far more about the evidence and views of the defence team but before he went 'public' on his change of stance. This is, however, merely my speculations on the matter. Well, I don't have to speculate, as I was talking to him about it on pretty much a weekly basis at the time, so no... it wasn't a "distraction" at all - he even asked me to help him find an attorney. In fact, it was during the time he was actively campaigning to defame Pam Hobbs and her public "questioning" of the Prosecution's case. I will show you elsewhere so as not to violate the "snag&drag" rule here, but it's pretty well documented.
ididjenna		#24	[-]
Posts: 32 (12/09/2008 7:10 PM) WM3DB Member Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	And you dont think he coulda been acting or playing your friend that whole time? I mean I dont know but its a possibility. GO SUNS!!!!!
newman		#25	[-]
Posts: 587 (12/09/2008 7:14 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	And you dont think he coulda been acting or playing your friend that whole time? I mean I dont know but its a possibility. Maybe it's something you should look into, THEN maybe comment? As I said, it's pretty well documented.
whitegoddess		#26	[-]
Posts: 1823 (12/12/2008 10:29 PM) Satin Worshiper Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Now that this topic has changed into a totally opposite direction AND has become Mark Byers bashing, i was wondering when it may be moved into O.T.? thanks Oh and Farm, only you could be that absolutely silly to go and assist in such. I mean, considerin that he had his own legal representation by that very same time Just remember that if it was only just late last year, all the allegations you have recently posted about him on a personal note, you knew about them all when you were 'assisting'. Kinda makes you look like a fair weather 'friend' now doesn't it? You felt he was a lovely person back then and not only sided with him, but even went out of your way to allegedly 'assist' him edited to add, funny you'd say such a thing too, as Mark had already been assisting the Defence Team and even making his own copies of conversations with the one that is now looking like a suspect in the boys murders. I think you are full of it..IMO Last Edited By: whitegoddess 12/12/2008 10:32 PM. Edited 1 times.
DaveNJEsq		#27	[-]
Posts: 501 (12/12/2008 11:23 PM) WM3DB Member Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	I'd be curious how anyone could sue Echols et al for wrongful death - there is a 2 year statute of limitations in most states, 6 at the most in other states. The convictions were in 1994.... On the other hand, a statute only runs from when a reasonable plaintiff would've known he / she had a basis to sue... so one could argue that the statute on TH is still open for wrongful death. Anyway, to the original topic here, even if TH could prove (1) the statements were false, and (2) that they were reckless (neither of which can he do), he'd hit another snag. Arkansas doesn't have defamation per se - meaning that TH will have to show damages. How can he trace any damages to Maines, when her statements (in 12/07) were over a month after the press conference (in 10/07 - 1 yr statute has run) by Riordan, et al, and several months after the Defense report was issued? Anything Maines said was incremental - the "damage" (if any) was done months earlier and got wider publicity than the rally / website. Ergo, even if TH "wins", he'd still lose.
whitegoddess		#28	[-]
Posts: 1825 (12/12/2008 11:37 PM) Satin Worshiper Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Miranda Ps To Mods:- If this is verging too much 'off topic' then my apologies and no probs if it is relocated there Sorry, i must have skimmed that this issue had already been raised regarding O.T....earlier than my posting above.
newman		#29	[-]
Posts: 665 (12/13/2008 8:39 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Oh and Farm, only you could be that absolutely silly to go and assist in such. I mean, considerin that he had his own legal representation by that very same time Not that you are clueless or anything, but well... you are. Just remember that if it was only just late last year Sounds like a reading comprehension problem? Unless you can come up with somewhere I said late last year? That's what I thought. I think you are full of it..IMO Didn't mean to soil the leg you hump? On to the next "confused" one... I'd be curious how anyone could sue Echols et al for wrongful death Gosh dave... I wonder if that's what the attorneys said? Anyway, to the original topic here, even if TH could prove (1) the statements were false, and (2) that they were reckless Done deal. Arkansas doesn't have defamation per se Did you not bother reading the claim you posted? Let me put it to you this way... you have absolutely no idea what you are spewing about. You never do.
TheBluePhantom		#30	[-]
Posts: 12 (12/13/2008 9:41 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Farmpuke you are nothing except a LIAR!!!
AnimeJSK		#31	[-]
Posts: 116 (12/13/2008 4:57 PM) WM3DB Member Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Farm, I think you forgot to answer this part....or, perhaps you can't address it except by a snide, self-assured little bickering comment? Ya got nothing, Farm -- nada: How can TH trace any damages to Maines, when her statements (in 12/07) were over a month after the press conference (in 10/07 - 1 yr statute has run) by Riordan, et al, and several months after the Defense report was issued? Anything Maines said was incremental - the "damage" (if any) was done months earlier and got wider publicity than the rally / website. Ergo, even if TH "wins", he'd still lose.
whitegoddess		#32	[-]
Posts: 1827 (12/13/2008 7:19 PM) Satin Worshiper Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Don't hold your breath sweets, it's an avoidance tactic he uses. Oh that and doctoring stuff to suit himself Bit like changing the topic and off onto something he can lie over. Oh which i see is still remaining, with no warning being mentioned....absolutely brilliant form i'd say!
wm wronged the 3		#33	[-]
Posts: 697 (12/13/2008 10:41 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Huh? Remove yourself from the equation...we're here to see them free! Last Edited By: wm wronged the 3 12/14/2008 9:31 PM. Edited 1 times.
kidsampson022	ta	#34	[-]
Posts: 162 (12/14/2008 12:04 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Farm is out- 'supported'., what..... about 15-1? So you all get to post, say 3 posts each to him in 4 or 5 different threads, but he only gets 10 posts a day. Subsequently he can't respond to you all. Whereas you (aside from emmaline) are concentrating on 1 thread, Farm is posting to about 5 because there are less Nons here than Supporters. It's a logic issue that some mistaken individual has turned into a control issue. Even playing field? Nope not now. He's being penalised for posting too much, but no thought has gone into why he has to post more. Like I said: No logic. Stop moaning and enjoy? sheer
jant22		#35	[-]
Posts: 751 (12/14/2008 9:41 AM) WM3DB Member Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Farm is absolutely correct You have absolutely NO idea what you are talking about. Not only do I know for a fact that he did, I even assisted him. Byers did the same with me, he wanted to know how much the wm3 fund was taking in because in his words he wanted a piece of the pie. I knew when he contacted a lawyer because yes I sent him the Cd's with the commentaries on them, because he wanted to know what Bruce was saying so he could give it to his lawyer. I also looked up every article that something bad was said about Byers, so no Farm is not lying, I too talked to Byers quite a bit, and new about his coming out before anyone else did. I also knew at this point that he was a liar. Byers ecpected to make a great deal of money by turning supporter, talk shows he hoped to be on to bad they all turned him down. Jan. West Memphis Three Hoax
kidsampson022		#36	[-]
Posts: 163 (12/14/2008 12:53 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	so no Farm is not lying, I too talked to Byers quite a bit, and new about his coming out before anyone else did. Jan! Stop being cruel, you'll make Rugs cry. sheer
newman		#37	[-]
Posts: 671 (12/14/2008 10:10 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	How can TH trace any damages to Maines, when her statements (in 12/07) were over a month after the press conference (in 10/07 - 1 yr statute has run) by Riordan, et al Here's a hint for you. The Press conference didn't report that a hair found at the scene was identified as Hobbs. Why not try to identify the issues BEFORE you address them? Save yourself some embarassment.
emmaline		#38	[-]
Posts: 342 (12/16/2008 2:05 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Whereas you (aside from emmaline) are concentrating on 1 thread, Farm is posting to about 5 because there are less Nons here than Supporters. It's a logic issue that some mistaken individual has turned into a control issue. HAHAHAHA! So it's our fault he posts so much? What, like that thread he started the other night then posted 5 responses to himself? You can't blame supporters for the frequency of Farm's posting, he replies un-necessarily to plenty of posts just for the sake of having the last word.
newman		#39	[-]
Posts: 704 (12/17/2008 11:16 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	..... she compuilsively replies again.
emmaline		#40	[-]
Posts: 352 (12/17/2008 11:18 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Awww Sheer look, poor little Farm is being 'forced' to reply to yet another post! Quick! Come help him out! Thanks for making my point there Farm by the way

Yuku free message boards

Quick Reply